![]() ![]() ![]() This means that chemists assume the chance of an electron being at any point in the molecule is the sum of the probabilities of the electron being there based on the individual atomic orbitals. Mostly a MO is represented as a linear combination of atomic orbitals (the LCAO-MO method), especially in approximate use. ![]() The electron configuration is the most likely position, and the energy of one (or one pair of) electron(s). A molecular orbital can give information about the electron configuration of a molecule. Molecular orbitals are created when atomic orbitals are brought together. However, the Born model eventually gained popular support because it was able to describe the locations of electrons within molecules and explained a number of previously inexplicable chemical reactions.Ītomic orbitals predict the position of an electron in an atom. Bohr's model described electrons as "orbiting" the nucleus, as they moved around in circles. When initially proposed, this theory did not agree with the atom model of Niels Bohr. Today, it is known as Born's rule and is part of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. Physicist Max Born described the theory behind molecular orbitals in 1926. The German physicist Erwin " That Damned Cat" Schrödinger wrote about MOs earlier. The word orbital was first used in English by Robert S. The various rounded shapes in an orbital diagram indicate where electrons would most likely be found in an atom. MOs answer questions about how the atoms in molecules stick together. Molecular orbitals allow chemists to apply quantum mechanics to study molecules. Hybrid orbitals from each atom of the molecule, or other molecular orbitals from groups of atoms can also be used. For example, the functions can tell the probability of finding an electron in any specific region.Ĭhemists usually build mathematical models of molecular orbitals by combining atomic orbitals. Chemists use such functions to predict or explain chemical and physical properties. A MO is a mathematical function which describes the wave-like behaviour of an electron in a molecule. The position was thus that there was empirical evidence in favour of these large forces, but that their theoretical nature was quite unknown.In chemistry, a molecular orbital (or MO) explains what happens to electrons when atoms join together in a molecule. It seemed to show that there were large forces coupling the spin vectors of the electrons in an atom, much larger forces than could be accounted for as due to the interaction of the magnetic moments of the electrons. The fact that one had to make this additional assumption was, however, a serious disadvantage, as no theoretical reasons to support it could be given. If s denoted the magnitude of the resultant spin angular momentum, this s was combined vectorially with the resultant orbital angular momentum l to give a multiplet of multiplicity 2 s + 1. With the help of this spin and Pauli’s exclusion principle, a satisfactory theory of multiplet terms was obtained when one made the additional assumption that the electrons in an atom all set themselves with their spins parallel or antiparallel. To get agreement with experiment it was found necessary to introduce the spin of the electron, giving a doubling in the number of orbits of an electron in an atom. Already before the arrival of quantum mechanics there existed a theory of atomic structure, based on Bohr’s ideas of quantised orbits, which was fairly successful in a wide field. It there fore becomes desirable that approximate practical methods of applying quantum mechanics should be developed, which can lead to an explanation of the main features of complex atomic systems without too much computation. The underlying physical laws necessary for the mathematical theory of a large part of physics and the whole of chemistry are thus completely known, and the difficulty is only that the exact application of these laws leads to equations much too complicated to be soluble. These give rise to difficulties only when high-speed particles are involved, and are therefore of no importance in the consideration of atomic and molecular structure and ordinary chemical reactions, in which it is, indeed, usually sufficiently accurate if one neglects relativity variation of mass with velocity and assumes only Coulomb forces between the various electrons and atomic nuclei. ![]() The general theory of quantum mechanics is now almost complete, the imperfections that still remain being in connection with the exact fitting in of the theory with relativity ideas. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |